My Experience Using Gemini 2.5 with 7 Popular ChatGPT Prompts – The Good, The Bad, and The Odd
Exploring ChatGPT’s Most Popular Prompts
User Engagement and Popularity
ChatGPT has quickly gained popularity, attracting around 400 million weekly users and handling approximately 1 billion queries daily. In contrast, Google’s Gemini model lags behind with about 42 million weekly users. This difference highlights ChatGPT’s broad appeal and its diverse user base, which ranges from job seekers to curious learners. Analyzing the types of questions asked can give insight into how people engage with AI technology.
Top 9 Prompt Types
Based on user trends and interactions with ChatGPT and its competitor, Gemini 2.5, here are nine common types of prompts that people frequently use.
1. Explain Concepts in Simple Terms
Example Prompt: "Explain quantum physics like I’m five."
- ChatGPT’s Response: Brief and to the point, emphasizing core ideas such as entanglement.
- Gemini 2.5’s Response: Used playful analogies (like Lego blocks) and covered multiple quantum concepts in a more engaging manner.
Best Use: For straightforward explanations, ChatGPT is efficient. For more vivid and fun explanations, Gemini is the better option.
2. Summarizing Texts or Articles
Example Prompt: "Summarize Taylor Swift’s song ‘Shake it Off’ in 3 sentences."
- ChatGPT’s Response: Punchy and upbeat, echoing the song’s lively spirit.
- Gemini 2.5’s Response: Provided an insightful breakdown of the song’s themes but sounded more formal.
Best Use: ChatGPT excels for energetic summaries, while Gemini is better for analytical perspectives.
3. Crafting Professional Documents
Example Prompt: "Write a cover letter for a social media manager applying to Nike."
- ChatGPT’s Response: Quickly captured the key points with a strong opening and a professional tone.
- Gemini 2.5’s Response: Delivered a structured cover letter, complete with tips for customization.
Best Use: ChatGPT is ideal for ready-to-use letters, whereas Gemini offers templates for those needing something personalized.
4. Coding Assistance
Example Prompt: "Write a Python function to check if a number is prime."
- ChatGPT’s Response: Created a concise and clear function, keeping the code neat.
- Gemini 2.5’s Response: Included detailed documentation and thorough explanations of the code.
Best Use: ChatGPT is suited for quick solutions, while Gemini is more appropriate for those who require in-depth explanations.
5. Rewriting Text
Example Prompt: "Rewrite the song ‘Itsy Bitsy Spider’ to sound more professional."
- ChatGPT’s Response: Maintained the song’s structure while elevating the language effectively.
- Gemini 2.5’s Response: Offered multiple versions with varied tones but seemed overly technical.
Best Use: For a balance of professionalism and readability, ChatGPT is preferred. Gemini provides versatility but may feel overly formal.
6. Translation Requests
Example Prompt: "Translate ‘Hope is the thing with feathers’ into Japanese."
- ChatGPT’s Response: Crafted a translation that retained the poetic nature of the original.
- Gemini 2.5’s Response: Focused on a literal translation with detailed explanations for each word.
Best Use: ChatGPT is better for artistic translations, while Gemini excels in grammatical accuracy.
7. Hypothetical Battles
Example Prompt: "Who would win: Batman or Iron Man?"
- ChatGPT’s Response: Offered a fun, entertaining take with humor and emojis.
- Gemini 2.5’s Response: Provided thorough arguments and considered various contexts.
Best Use: For light-hearted debates, ChatGPT is perfect, while Gemini offers a balanced, neutral analysis.
Diverging Styles and User Preferences
When comparing the responses of ChatGPT and Gemini 2.5, it becomes clear that they cater to different user preferences. ChatGPT shines when users seek quick, engaging responses that are easy to digest. In contrast, Gemini 2.5 stands out with its detailed, structured, and meticulously crafted outputs, appealing to those who prefer comprehensive information.
Choosing between the two ultimately depends on individual needs—whether for concise answers or thorough explanations, both chatbots have their unique strengths.
